PART 8 OF 10: THE ITALIAN LEGACY – Ettore Majorana, Rolando Pelizza, and the Secret of Serra San Bruno

While Nikola Tesla was working in the United States on energy rays, on the other side of the Atlantic another genius, perhaps even more profound and enigmatic, was revolutionizing the physics of matter. His name is Ettore Majorana, the Sicilian physicist who mysteriously disappeared in 1938 at only 31 years old. The official version speaks of suicide or escape to South America. But a parallel investigation, supported by shocking testimonies, disturbing documents, and even television productions, tells a different story: Majorana did not die, but hid in a convent in Calabria, where he continued his research on a "machine" capable of disintegrating matter. And this machine could be the "Italian sister" of the weapon used on 9/11.

The Disappearance and the Refuge in Serra San Bruno

On March 26, 1938, Ettore Majorana vanished into thin air during a sea voyage from Palermo to Naples. Since then, his fate has been one of the great mysteries of science. The writer Leonardo Sciascia, in his essay "The Disappearance of Majorana" (1975), was the first to hypothesize that the physicist had voluntarily retired to a monastery, unable to bear the weight of the war implications of his discoveries.
But where? Recent investigations, particularly those by journalist Rino Di Stefano and the testimonies of entrepreneur Rolando Pelizza (who passed away in 2022), point the finger towards the Charterhouse of Serra San Bruno, a cloistered hermitage in the mountains of Calabria.
According to this reconstruction, Majorana lived hidden among the friars for decades, protected by a complicit silence, continuing to work on advanced quantum physics theories that went far beyond nuclear fission.

The "Majorana Machine" and Rolando Pelizza

Here the story becomes a scientific thriller. Rolando Pelizza, an entrepreneur from Brescia, claimed for over 40 years to have met Majorana in the Calabrian convent in the late 1950s. Becoming his student and "operational arm," Pelizza allegedly received from the physicist the formulas and instructions to build a revolutionary "machine".
What was this machine capable of? According to Pelizza and the documents he showed (autograph letters, photos, videos):
1. Annihilate matter: Disintegrate atoms instantly, reducing solid objects to inert dust, without explosions.
2. Produce infinite energy: Drawing from the quantum vacuum.
3. Transmute elements: Convert one material into another.
4. Rejuvenate tissues: Manipulating biological matter at the cellular level.

This description is eerily similar to the effects observed on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001: instantaneous pulverization, absence of explosions, transformation of steel into fine dust.

Television Proof: "The Machine from the Future"

This story did not remain confined to obscure internet forums. In 2008, the RSI (Swiss Italian Radio and Television) broadcast an investigative documentary significantly titled: "The Machine from the Future", directed by filmmaker Victor Tognola.
The documentary, still viewable today (also on platforms like YouTube), interviews Pelizza, analyzes the alleged documents, and reconstructs the events with a serious and investigative tone. The presence of a European public broadcaster dedicating an entire production to this story gives the affair a credibility that goes beyond simple conspiracy theory. Tognola explores the hypothesis that the machine really exists and has been the subject of international disputes.

PART 7 OF 10: THE AMERICAN LEGACY – Nikola Tesla, John G. Trump, and Donald's Silence

If forensic evidence tells us how the towers collapsed (directed energy weapons), history suggests who might have had access to this technology decades before it became public. The roots of September 11 are buried in a secret kept for over 60 years: the documents of Nikola Tesla and the role of the Trump family.

Tesla's Death and the FBI Seizure (1943)

When Nikola Tesla, the Serbian-American genius father of alternating current and visionary of free energy, died alone on January 7, 1943, in room 3327 of the New Yorker Hotel in New York, the United States government acted with suspicious speed. Less than 24 hours after his death, the FBI (through the Office of Alien Property) seized all his belongings, notes, projects, and prototypes.
Among these documents were the plans for the famous "Death Ray" (Teleforce), a theoretical weapon capable of projecting high-energy particle beams able to shoot down planes hundreds of kilometers away and, potentially, disintegrate matter. There were also studies on wireless energy transmission and "free energy" technologies that could have revolutionized (or destroyed) the oil-based world economy.

The Role of John G. Trump: The Engineer Uncle

The task of analyzing this immense and dangerous archive was entrusted to a trusted man: Dr. John G. Trump, professor of electrical engineering at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and an expert in radar and high voltage.
John G. Trump was not just any technician. He was Donald Trump's paternal uncle.
The official report drafted by John G. Trump stated that Tesla's documents contained nothing dangerous or feasible, calling them "the fantasies of an old eccentric." Consequently, most of the material was classified, scattered, or partially returned to the family, while the most sensitive projects disappeared into the vaults of intelligence agencies or secret military laboratories (like the future Area 51).
But is it really possible that a physics genius like John G. Trump failed to recognize the revolutionary value of Tesla's inventions? Or was his report a necessary lie to protect (and hide) the most powerful technology ever conceived?

PART 6 OF 10: IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE – Seismic Silence, Ozone, and the Chemistry of the Impossible

So far, we have talked about what was seen: towers pulverizing, buildings collapsing without being hit, mysterious flashes. But the most crushing proof of the use of exotic weapons on September 11 comes not from videos, but from what was not seen and what was smelled. We are talking about seismic data, odors reported by rescuers, and the chemical composition of the Ground Zero dust. These elements constitute the "body of the crime" that the official version has never been able to explain coherently.

The Silence of the Seismographs: Proof of "No Explosives"

One of the most technical and decisive arguments, often ignored by the media, is the analysis of seismograms recorded by the Lamont-Doherty Observatory of Columbia University, located about 34 km from New York.
Seismographs are extremely sensitive instruments capable of detecting vibrations in the ground. On September 11, they clearly recorded two distinct events: the impact of the first plane on the North Tower and the impact of the second plane on the South Tower. The peaks on the graph are net and undeniable.
However, and this is the crucial point, there is no significant seismic peak corresponding to the start of the collapses.
If tons of explosives had been used (as required by any conventional controlled demolition theory), the seismographs would have detected powerful and sequential explosions before the buildings started to move. Instead, the graph remains flat, silent. The seismic signal increases only when the mass of the towers (or rather, the dust) begins to hit the ground.
This preliminary "silence" proves that there were no large explosions on the ground or in the structure. The towers collapsed "in silence", consistent with an action of instantaneous internal disintegration caused by an energy ray (DEW), which does not generate mechanical shock waves like chemical explosives.

PART 5 OF 10: FORBIDDEN SCIENCE II – The Ghost Skyscraper and the Woolworth Flashes

If the pulverization of the Twin Towers is the most evident scientific anomaly, the collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) is the greatest political enigma. While Towers 1 and 2 had been hit by two airliners, WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper located just over a hundred meters away, was not hit by any aircraft. It suffered only collateral damage from debris from the neighboring towers and some localized fires of modest intensity. Yet, at 5:20 PM that afternoon, it collapsed on itself perfectly, symmetrically, and at free-fall speed.

The "Impossible" Collapse of WTC 7

How can a steel building collapse in seconds, with symmetry typical of a controlled demolition, without any preliminary explosions? The official version attributes the collapse to fires, but structural physics tells us that fire alone cannot bring down a modern skyscraper at free-fall speed. To achieve such a collapse, the load-bearing columns on the lower floors must fail all at the same instant.
Dr. Judy Wood and other independent researchers have demonstrated that the only way to achieve this result is through a remote structural deactivation system, consistent with the use of Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). No explosives planted months in advance (impossible in a crowded building) were needed; a beam of energy pointed from the outside was enough to "switch off" the steel's resistance floor by floor.

The Mysterious Flashes and the Woolworth Building

But where did this ray come from? Here our investigation crosses eyewitness testimonies and shocking video evidence. Numerous New Yorkers and researchers reported seeing intense flashes, white or blue lights, coming from the Lower Manhattan area just as the towers began to collapse.
The privileged point of observation, and perhaps of emission, appears to be the Woolworth Building. This historic skyscraper, known as the "Cathedral of Commerce" for its neo-Gothic style, is located in a strategic position relative to the World Trade Center. Its height and architecture made it the ideal place to hide or position targeting devices.
Some witnesses described flashes of light seeming to start from the top of the Woolworth or nearby buildings, heading towards the Towers and WTC 7. These were not sun reflections (the direction did not match) nor explosions (the shock wave was missing). They were the visible signature of an energy weapon activation.

Rete Voltaire I principali titoli della settimana 15 set 2026

Focus La menzogna dell’11 settembre 2001 continua a condizionarci la vita di Thierry Meyssan Parigi (Francia)   Quanto accaduto l’11 settembre 2001 non appartiene al passato. Le guerre in Ucraina, Palestina e Iran ne sono il diretto prolungamento. Possiamo sbagliare nemico e mantenere lo sguardo fisso, ammirato, su una potenza che semina caos e disgrazie. Ma nascondere a noi stessi la verità non potrà che portarci a essere, a nostra volta, immersi nel caos e nella sventura.   Notizie dal fronte ucraino di Thierry Meyssan Parigi (Francia)   Gli Stati Uniti e la Russia vogliono concludere la pace in Ucraina il più rapidamente possibile. Il problema è diverso da quello che si crede: sembra che gli straussiani — i discepoli di Leo Strauss — già infiltrati nelle amministrazioni Obama e Biden, oggi siano sostenuti dagli europei. Ma sono proprio loro ad aver scatenato questo inutile conflitto.   In breve   Dieci giorni prima del 7 ottobre MBZ aveva informato Netanyahu di un’importante offensiva di Hamas   Controversie La nuova cortina di ferro di Manlio Dinucci Roma (Italia)  | Nel 1946, Londra pianificò di bombardare l’Unione Sovietica con armi nucleari, denunciando al contempo la "cortina di ferro" calata sull’Europa. Ottant’anni dopo, Londra pianifica un attacco sottomarino contro la Russia e denuncia l’"invasione" russa dell’Ucraina. Stiamo ripetendo gli stessi errori dei nostri genitori.   I disastri della guerre di Manlio Dinucci Roma (Italia)  | La pace ottenuta con la forza è uno slogan che ha sempre galvanizzato le folle, conducendole però alla catastrofe. Invocato oggi dal presidente Donald Trump, non gli ha permesso di sconfiggere una potenza di medio livello come l’Iran, e sta di conseguenza gettando centinaia di milioni di persone, senza alcun legame con questo conflitto, nella povertà e, presto, nella carestia.       Arabia Saudita, Pakistan e Turchia formano un’alleanza militare contro Israele Rete Voltaire , 8 settembre 2026   abbonamento    Reclami

_______________________________________________
Voltaire-in-italiano mailing list
Voltaire-in-italiano@voltairenet.org
https://lists.voltairenet.org/mailman/listinfo/voltaire-in-italiano

PART 4 OF 10: FORBIDDEN SCIENCE I – Judy Wood and the Mystery of the Dust: Where Did the Towers Go?

While the world watched live images of the Twin Towers collapsing on the morning of September 11, 2001, almost no one asked the fundamental question, the one that should have stopped all news broadcasts: where did the matter go?

According to conventional physics and structural engineering, a 415-meter steel and concrete building that collapses should leave a mountain of debris at its base. Steel beams tens of meters long, huge concrete blocks, twisted structures should accumulate to form a hill of rubble several stories high. Instead, at Ground Zero, the debris was surprisingly scarce. Most of the mass of the towers seemed to have simply... disappeared.

Dr. Judy Wood and the Forensic Investigation

The one who asked this question was Dr. Judy Wood, graduated in mechanical and materials engineering from Clemson University, with a PhD in materials science. For over a decade, Wood analyzed more than 40,000 photographs, hundreds of videos, dust samples, and seismic data related to 9/11. The result of her investigation is collected in the book "Where Did The Towers Go?", a work that shook the foundations of the official version.

Wood's conclusion is shocking: the towers did not collapse to the ground driven by gravity. They disintegrated in mid-air.

The Phenomenon of "Dustification"

Wood coined a specific term to describe what happened: "dustification". According to her analyses, about 80-90% of the upper mass of the towers (the part hit by the planes and the section below down to the impact point) was transformed into a very fine dust before even touching the ground.
This is not simply debris shattered by the impact. The dust of Ground Zero was homogeneous, gray, composed predominantly of microspheres of silicate and iron.

PART 3 OF 10: HISTORICAL CONTEXT II – September 11, 1870: Cadorna's Proclamation and the End of an Era

If September 11, 1860, had marked the beginning of the siege on the Papal States, exactly ten years later, on September 11, 1870, history accelerated towards its epilogue. On that day, from his headquarters in Terni, General Raffaele Cadorna issued a message destined to go down in history: the Proclamation to the Romans.

It was not a simple military communiqué. It was a political act of immense significance. Cadorna, commander of the IV Army Corps of Italy, solemnly declared that the army of King Vittorio Emanuele II was not entering the Roman provinces as an enemy, but as a liberator. His task, he stated, was to guarantee order and the inviolability of the national soil, inviting the population to collaborate. In fact, it was the final ultimatum to Pius IX: the Kingdom of Italy was about to take what it considered its own by historical and geographical right: Rome.

The Invasion and the March on Rome

That same September 11, Italian troops, numbering about 60,000 men, crossed the border near Orte and Civitavecchia. The resistance of the Papal State was symbolic: just over 13,000 soldiers, including the loyal Pontifical Zouaves commanded by the Swiss general Hermann Kanzler, could not stop the tricolor tide. The march towards the Capital was rapid and almost bloodless. Cities surrendered one after another: Viterbo, Civitavecchia, Frosinone.

September 20 and the Breach of Porta Pia

Nine days after the Proclamation, on September 20, 1870, Italian bersaglieri opened a breach in the Aurelian Walls near Porta Pia. In a few hours, Rome was conquered. The temporal power of the Popes, lasting over a millennium, ceased to exist. Pius IX declared himself a "prisoner in the Vatican", giving rise to the so-called Roman Question, which would only be resolved with the Lateran Pacts of 1929.

The Date of September 11: A Symbolic Choice?

Why did Cadorna choose precisely September 11 to issue the Proclamation and begin operations? Certainly, there were strategic reasons: the fall of the Second French Empire (which occurred on September 4, 1870, after the defeat at Sedan) had left the Pope without his powerful protector, Napoleon III. The path was clear.
However, for those who see a subtler plot in history, the recurrence of the date of September 11 (already used in 1860 for the invasion of the Marche) suggests a precise will. For the secular and Masonic forces of the Risorgimento, September 11 seemed to be the ill-fated date for the Papacy, the day destined to begin the work of secularizing Italy.